2026年06月六级第1套仔细阅读 Passage 2 原文翻译及答案解析 进入互动练习 →

2026年06月六级第1套仔细阅读 Passage 2 原文翻译及答案解析

本页收录2026年06月六级第1套仔细阅读(Reading Comprehension Section C)第 2 篇的英文原文、逐段中文翻译、全部题目与答案解析。仔细阅读共 2 篇、10 题,每题 2 分,是六级阅读部分分值占比最高的题型。

Passage 2

Directions: There are 2 passages in this section. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked A), B), C), and D). You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through the centre.

About a decade ago, the G-20, a forum of the world's biggest economies, agreed to crack down on multinational corporations' abusive use of tax havens. This resulted in a plan that aimed to curb practices that shielded a large chunk of corporate profits from tax authorities.

大约十年前,由世界最大经济体组成的论坛 G-20 同意打击跨国公司滥用避税天堂的行为。这促成了一项计划,旨在遏制那些使大量企业利润免于被税务机关征税的做法。

But, instead of reining in the use of tax havens—countries such as the Bahamas and Cayman Islands with very low or no effective tax rates—the problem has only gotten worse.

但结果并没有遏制住对避税天堂——如实际税率极低或为零的巴哈马和开曼群岛等国家——的利用,问题反而愈演愈烈。

In a new study, we measured the excessive profits reported in tax havens that cannot be explained by ordinary economic activity such as employees, factories and research in that country. Our findings show a striking pattern of artificial shifting of paper profits to tax havens by corporations, which has been relentless since the 1980s.

在一项新研究中,我们测算了在避税天堂申报的、无法用当地雇员、工厂和研究等正常经济活动来解释的超额利润。我们的研究结果显示出一种惊人的模式:企业人为地将账面利润转移到避税天堂,自20世纪80年代以来一直有增无减。

We found that the world's biggest multinational businesses shifted 37% of the profits— $969 billion—they earned in other countries to tax havens in 2019. The figure was less than 2% in the 1970s. The main reasons for the large increase were the growth of the tax avoidance industry in the 1980s and U.S. policies that made it easier to shift profits from high-tax countries to tax havens.

我们发现,2019年,世界最大的跨国企业将它们在其他国家赚取利润的37%——即9690亿美元——转移到了避税天堂。这一比例在20世纪70年代还不到2%。大幅增长的主要原因是20世纪80年代避税产业的兴起,以及美国出台的、使利润更容易从高税国家转移到避税天堂的政策。

We estimate that the amount of corporate taxes lost as a result reached 10% of total corporate revenue in 2019, up from less than 0.1% in the 1970s. In 2019, the total government tax loss globally was $250 billion. U.S. multinational corporations alone accounted for about half of that, followed by the U.K. and Germany.

我们估计,由此导致的企业税流失在2019年达到企业总收入的10%,而在20世纪70年代还不到0.1%。2019年,全球政府税收损失总额为2500亿美元。仅美国跨国公司就约占其中的一半,其次是英国和德国。

How do policymakers fix this? So far, the world as a whole has been trying to solve this problem by cutting or scrapping corporate taxes in a very gradual way. In the past 40 years, the global effective corporate tax rate has fallen from 23% to 17%. At the same time, governments have relied more heavily on consumption taxes.

政策制定者如何解决这一问题?到目前为止,整个世界一直试图以非常渐进的方式,通过削减或取消企业税来解决这一问题。在过去40年里,全球实际企业税率已从23%降至17%。与此同时,各国政府越来越依赖消费税。

But the root cause of profit-shifting is the incentives involved, such as generous or lenient corporate tax rates in other countries. If countries could agree on a global minimum corporate tax rate of, say, 20%, the problem of profit-shifting would largely disappear, as tax havens would simply cease to exist.

但利润转移的根本原因在于其中的激励因素,比如其他国家慷慨或宽松的企业税率。如果各国能够就一个全球最低企业税率——比如说20%——达成一致,利润转移问题将在很大程度上消失,因为避税天堂将不复存在。

This type of mechanism is exactly what more than 130 countries signed onto in 2021, with implementation of a 15% minimum tax set to begin soon in the EU, U.K., Japan, Indonesia and many other countries. The U.S. has notably not been able to pass this legislation.

正是这种机制,130多个国家在2021年签署加入,欧盟、英国、日本、印度尼西亚等许多国家即将开始实施15%的最低税率。值得注意的是,美国一直未能通过这项立法。

Our research suggests implementing this type of tax reform is necessary in reversing the shift of ever-greater amounts of corporate profits to tax havens—instead of being taxed by the governments where they operate and create value.

我们的研究表明,要扭转越来越多的企业利润流向避税天堂——而不是由其经营并创造价值所在国政府征税——的趋势,实施这类税制改革是必要的。

51. What do we learn about the G-20's agreement on curbing the use of tax havens?
A) It has aggravated the problem in non-G-20 countries.
B) It has taken a toll on countries such as Cayman Islands.
C) It has failed to achieve the expected outcome.
D) It has failed to result in any long-term plan.
答案 C
解析细节推断题。第一、二段指出 G-20 曾同意打击避税天堂并制定了计划,但'instead of reining in the use of tax havens... the problem has only gotten worse',说明协议未达到预期效果,与 C 一致。
定位句instead of reining in the use of tax havens... the problem has only gotten worse.
52. What mainly accounted for the large increase in the world's biggest multinational corporations' shift of profits to tax havens?
A) Fluctuating tax rates globally.
B) Lenient policies of the U.S.
C) Heavy taxes imposed on them.
D) Rapid growth of their business.
答案 B
解析细节理解题。第四段指出大幅增长的主要原因是80年代避税产业的兴起,以及'U.S. policies that made it easier to shift profits',即美国的宽松政策,与 B 一致。
定位句U.S. policies that made it easier to shift profits from high-tax countries to tax havens.
53. What have policymakers been doing to prevent government tax loss?
A) Reducing corporate taxes step by step.
B) Scrapping consumption taxes gradually.
C) Making joint efforts to levy corporate taxes.
D) Adjusting global effective corporate tax rates.
答案 A
解析细节理解题。第六段指出世界一直'by cutting or scrapping corporate taxes in a very gradual way'来试图解决问题,即逐步削减企业税,与 A 一致。
定位句the world as a whole has been trying to solve this problem by cutting or scrapping corporate taxes in a very gradual way.
54. What does the author say would bring tax havens to an end?
A) The alignment of corporate taxes with consumption taxes.
B) The implementation of generous tax rates in all countries.
C) The agreement on the root cause of global profit-shifting.
D) The imposition of a global minimum corporate tax rate.
答案 D
解析细节理解题。第七段指出若各国能就'a global minimum corporate tax rate'达成一致,利润转移问题将基本消失,'as tax havens would simply cease to exist',即全球最低企业税率会终结避税天堂,与 D 一致。
定位句If countries could agree on a global minimum corporate tax rate... as tax havens would simply cease to exist.
55. What could be expected of the global problem of profit-shifting in the near future?
A) It would be solved with more countries cutting tax rates.
B) It would end with governments' awareness of its severity.
C) It would cease to exist with worldwide corporate support.
D) It would continue because of noncooperation from the U.S.
答案 D
解析推断题。第八段指出130多个国家已签署最低税率机制、即将实施,但'The U.S. has notably not been able to pass this legislation',末段强调改革的必要性,暗示美国不合作会使利润转移问题继续存在,与 D 一致。
定位句The U.S. has notably not been able to pass this legislation.